pathetic piss kitten (@kitten)

famfo (without manual) @famfo@frogs.lgbt

If the DB WiFi would implement IPv6, it wouldn't run out of DHCP leases

pathetic piss kitten @kitten@elizabeth.cat

@famfo .......what netmask do they use to run out of them?

famfo (without manual) @famfo@frogs.lgbt

@kitten I'm so confused

pathetic piss kitten @kitten@elizabeth.cat

@famfo look I know you like doing that whole "having people without seats in the ICE" thing, I like it too, but having 65536 beings in a single train is too much

pathetic piss kitten @kitten@elizabeth.cat

@famfo (also interesting they use the CG-NAT range and not just 10.0.0.0/8 :neocat_think:)

famfo (without manual) @famfo@frogs.lgbt

@kitten I'm at a train station having bahn'd Eloy, jn and myself

Mike @mroach@mas.to

@famfo @kitten That’s an interesting choice to use the CG-NAT address space for public wifi on a train.

pathetic piss kitten @kitten@elizabeth.cat

@mroach @famfo I thought the same, but at the same time, I guess it's nice it won't mess up with whatever internal networking people might have in their devices...maybe?

and like, I guess they kinda count as an ISP here?

Mike @mroach@mas.to

@kitten @famfo Yeah I can appreciate that. On my local systems I use the 198.18.32.0/20 address space for Docker and VMs specifically to avoid conflicts with LAN addresses.