User avatar
mei unleashed @meithecatte@is.badat.dev
10mo
OH, wtf, sun microsystems, diapers OH: anyway, if you're prone to diaper accidents, you'll be happy to know that SPARC V9...
1
1
1
0
User avatar
pathetic piss kitten @kitten@elizabeth.cat
10mo
OH, wtf, sun microsystems, diapers @meithecatte what? what should I know?!?!
:neofox_3c@total.necrophilia.win:1
1
0
2
1
User avatar
mei unleashed @meithecatte@is.badat.dev
10mo
explanation, re: OH, wtf, sun microsystems, diapers @kitten so, you know how on x86, if you throw a fault while entering a fault handler, it's considered a double fault, and it's Bad, and if you throw a fault while entering the double fault handler, it resets the machine?

so on SPARC V9, there's 6 levels of that. well, rather, an implementation-dependent number of levels. on CPUs that implement the virtualization extensions, it's more!

what does that have to do with diapers? well uh. if you consider a fault to be an accident, then a fault handler is kind of a diaper. and a double fault is kind of a diaper fault. so kinda like if your diaper leaks?

i'm sure that from here you can reconstruct the chain of riffing on each other's jokes that led to the post in question
1
0
3
0
User avatar
pathetic piss kitten @kitten@elizabeth.cat
10mo
explanation, re: OH, wtf, sun microsystems, diapers @meithecatte SPARC V9 ​:neocat_pleading:​
0
0
1
0